Peer review is not always the best way to allocate research funding, a report by policy-research organisation RAND Europe has concluded.
Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding, funded by a Department of Health policy research programme and published this week, evaluates nine alternative systems that are used around the world.
This article is only available to Research Professional News subscribers or Pivot-RP users.
If you are a Research Professional News subscriber you can log in and view the article via this link
Pivot-RP users can log in and view the article via this link.